Biblical Answers to the World Mission Society Church of God

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world.--1 John 4:1

Are you or a loved one struggling with this group? Do you need Biblical answers about the World Mission Society Church of God (WMSCoG or CoGWMS), their founder Ahnsahnghong (Ahn Sahng/Sang-Hong) or their current leader "Mother Jerusalem" (a.k.a. "Heavenly Mother God," Zang/Zahng Gil-Jah, or Chung Gil Cha)? Thank you for coming here. I hope my blog helps you. Questions and comments are always welcome.

Sunday, January 29, 2017

The Queen's Award and the WMSCOG -- Fact and Fiction

The World Mission Society Church of God has been pursuing a reputation for volunteer activity and community service in the locations of its various branches. Members participate in events such as blood drives, community clean up, family events, and the like. (See examples here.)

Community service itself is wonderful. It is admirable for people to invest their time and effort to improve the world around us and to help people in need. My family and I have done it. Most people who do this are sincere and loving about it, and I believe that most members of the WMSCOG who participate in these activities do so genuinely.

Because volunteer community services are so commendable, it's a very unpleasant and sensitive thing to have to criticize any part of it, and I do so reluctantly. My message here is in no way intended to denigrate the volunteers or detract from the valuable work they have done in their communities. Please know that the following criticisms are not directed at the members who do the volunteer work, but at the leaders who use the results of this work to make misrepresentations about the WMSCOG.

Last summer the WMSCOG was awarded the Queen's Award for Voluntary Services. The WMSCOG and its members have been very excited and have published articles, videos, and comments about it around the web. If you have had anything to do with the WMSCOG, surely you have already heard about it. After all, it is prominently displayed on their main website's front page. Here's a screen shot...

I greatly admire Queen Elizabeth II, and so this interested me a lot. Over the last months I've been researching and watching -- What is this award? How is it earned? Is it everything the WMSCOG says? Are they representing it correctly to their members and the public?
Here is what I discovered...

The United Kingdom's government sites will tell you all about this award and how groups are nominated and selected and also a list of recipients. There is contact information available as well, for those of us who want more information about the award.

This is a legitimate and prestigious award. It is well-earned and an honor for those groups who receive it. However, there are numerous problems with the way the WMSCOG has represented this award.

Did the WMSCOG earn this award?
The award was earned by the "UK Zion," which is the specific local branch of the WMSCOG in Manchester, UK. This award was NOT given to the larger, corporate WMSCOG or any of their other local branches. For that to be stated or implied is inappropriate and against the nature of the award.

Think of Bob Dylan, who won the Nobel Prize for Literature last year for his songwriting. It would be improper for his record label to claim that they won the prize, or for other artists sharing that record label or singing with Bob Dylan to claim that they also won the prize.

This was clarified for me by a representative of the Queen's Award who told me, "It is possible for a group affiliated to a wider group to be given the award, however, it only applies to the local group." She went on to say that it "does not apply to the wider organisation and any mention of the Award on websites or marketing information should reflect this."

Do their websites reflect this? Well, read for yourself...
This article at,
This article at,
An article about their celebration event in Korea,
This video from the WMSCOG,
Another video from the WMSCOG.

How about these news articles that show local branches in the USA appropriating this award for themselves (see screen shot)? All of these articles (like this one) state "News provided by World Mission Society Church of God."

Even if they have not directly applied the award to "the wider organisation," they have implied it to enough of an extent that the casual reader would easily think that the entire worldwide church earned the award. Even their own members can easily misunderstand this if the WMSCOG does not specifically clarify it.

Are WMSCOG members now MBEs?
No. I wondered this because of the WMSCOG's statement:
"The Queen's Award for Voluntary Service recipients are made the Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire [MBE]. Just like individuals, groups that were recognized with an MBE can use this British honor with their names. They are also entitled to use the Queen's Award emblem on their website, stationery, and other printed material."
I was confused because I couldn't quite tell if the WMSCOG was saying that individual members could now use MBE with their names. Also, the UK's official information online did not explain for me if that was how this honor worked, so I asked the Queen's Award for more information.

The representative answered that although the award is equivalent in status for a group as an MBE is for an individual, "The Award is given to the overall group and it does not apply to individuals and therefore, it is not possible for individuals to use the title behind their name."

She also clarified for me the meaning of "MBE." She said, "The MBE title you have used 'Member of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire' is not recognised by us and the correct title is 'Member of the Order of the British Empire (MBE).'" There is more information about the honors system online.

I can see how the WMSCOG might be confused about the title since I have seen it used with "the Most Excellent" phrase elsewhere online. Perhaps it is an outdated phrase, but in any case it is not used on the official government websites.

What about the wording on the certificate?
The certificate, signed by the Queen, says,
Elizabeth the Second,
By the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland,
and of Our other Realms and Territories, Queen, Defender of the Faith, to
a group of volunteers from the World Mission Society Church of God,
share Mother's love through a range of initiatives.
We being cognisant of the said group's voluntary work in the community,
and being desirous of showing Our Royal Favour do hereby confer upon it:
The Queen's Golden Jubilee Award...
When the WMSCOG states, "The Queen praises the Church of God for performing the role of salt and light" (in this article), and "The award certificate signed by Queen Elizabeth II herself states its purpose and meaning clearly" (in this article, and similarly in this video), it gave me the impression that the Queen knows and approves of the message of "Mother God."

However, the phrase "UK ZION, a group of volunteers from the World Mission Society Church of God, share Mother's love through a range of initiatives" did not come from the Queen or the award committee. That "citation" part of the certificate is provided by either the organisation itself or the person nominating it. We can tell this because of the guidance notes for the award.

How long did it take for the UK Zion to be approved for this award?
According to a WMSCOG article and two videos (this one and this one, see screen shot), the local branch "has carried out volunteer services constantly for four years" and has been through a "rigorous assessment procedure for three years."

I understand those statements to mean that the Manchester branch did such a wonderful job of community work the first year that they were then nominated for the award and spent the next three years continuing their work while the "rigorous assessment procedure" was taking place. (If that's not what was meant, they might want to reword it.)

Well, the assessment is "thorough and rigorous" as described on the Queen's Award website, but it seems the WMSCOG's timeline is a bit off.

A group must have been doing their volunteer work for at least three years in order to be nominated, and it can be approved for the award in as quickly as one year (or less--nominations close in September for awards given the following June, see here for more information), or it may take as long as three years for a group to be approved for the award (info here).

The dates were also off on the Manchester branch's annual report submitted to the Charity Commission of the UK. The report was to cover the time period from August 2014 to August 2015, yet in Section D when it asks for a "summary of the main achievements of the charity during the year," they wrote "Queen's Award for Voluntary Service," even though they did not get the award until June 2016.

Was Kim Joo-cheol invited to Buckingham Palace by the Queen?
There is a picture of Kim Joo-cheol receiving the award, and the WMSCOG article says, "Before the award ceremony was held, General Pastor Kim Joo-cheol was invited by the [sic] Queen Elizabeth II as the representative of the Church of God to Buckingham Palace." I wondered if the General Pastor from Korea was actually personally invited by the Queen. That would be a prestigious invitation indeed.

The answer is no. The award notes tell us that each successful group is "allocated 2 places at the annual royal garden party at Buckingham Palace in London or the Palace of Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh." It was the WMSCOG who chose to send Kim Joo-cheol, not the Queen.

Was the WMSCOG the only religious organization to receive the award this year?
In this article and this video (see screen shot), the WMSCOG states, "among a total of 193 invited charities, social enterprises, and voluntary groups, the only religious organization is the World Mission Society Church of God."

That is false. The UK has published a list of award recipients for 2016. I did not look up all 193 of them, but here are some of the ones that are definitely religion-based:
Open Hands Trust, Christian
Federation of Jewish Services, Jewish
Urban Outreach, Christian
Inter Madrassah Organisation, Muslim
The Boy's Brigade, Christian
Mary's Meals, Catholic
Paisley Wynd Centre, Christian
Southend-on-Sea Street Pastors, Christian
Masjid-E-Zeenat-Ul-Islam, Muslim
Salisbury Cathedral Volunteers, Christian
Manna House, Christian
Carriers of Hope, Christian
Good Shepherd Ministry, Catholic
Radio Plus, Christian
Sikh Union Coventry, Sikh

The value of fact-checking
How many times after a presidential speech or debate between candidates have you seen the media fact-checking? It's an important part of keeping our leaders accountable to speak the truth and avoid misrepresentations.

Fact-checking the WMSCOG's publicity of the Queen's Award has revealed several areas where they have made mistakes.

This is an esteemed award, and those who do the work to earn it deserve the honor of being recognized by the Queen. When it is misrepresented, as the WMSCOG leadership has done, it detracts from the honor.

For a previous post about WMSCOG awards, click here.


  1. Hey! Just happened to come across your blog today. Keep it up!

  2. My goodness, Genny, I need to applaud you for your timeless research and drive to prove these people as the hypocrites they are. Honestly, I have a strong distrust for churches thanks to them. Don't get me wrong, cause there are "good" people there. However, if you say you're a Christain and your Church was founded by Christ himself, then I'm afraid that yoir church needs to be perfect, without any inconsistancies whatsoever. Often times you are floored by how much people are willing to follow them. But to be critical, I did find their Bible Studies to be pretty good, although confusing (which is bad cause then I'm liable to believe any old shite). Concerning the Queen's Award, when they flaunted it on almost every space of the church I visited, I just rolled my eyes cause I knew what was coming next. Oh, I was a prospective member, by the way. Never showed to any of their services, but did join Bible Studies. Anyway, when the conversation inevitably went to the subject of the award, I pointed out that it was irrelevant. Confusion plagued the vicinity like a virus in a zombie movie. When I further explained why you shouldn't use awards to glorify your church and cement new members (similar reasoning to yours) they took offence to it. I shook my head when they argued that the Catholic church isn't as great as it used to be. I just stared at the person in charge of Bible Studies and said, "I know you hate Catholics.I don't believe in them, either, but, dude, are you seriously going to bring up these massive achievments every time I come here? Or how much Catholics shouldn't be trusted? Let God judge and let us focus on understanding the bible." After giving me a rather lingering, incredulous stare, we got back to studying. Here's the thing, I believe what they say and claim is true to a certain point. However, as soon as that certain point is reached, it just turns to blatant lies. A Korean man was the second coming Christ? I missed his second coming? Wait, wait, only a select few of Koreans witnessed his second coming? But...but didn't the Bible say that EVERYONE will know when Christ comes again? Yes, but only the ones that study the Bible...? But...screw this, I'm done with you crazy people.

  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    1. Oops meant to delete one of the comments since it was written twice:/

    2. When that happens, I usually only publish one, but yours were different enough, I wasn't sure which one you meant to post.
      I think you only meant to delete one of the two, so I will repost one for you.
      You said, "The Bible says we are all one body in Christ! If UK Zion won, we all won! The Church of God is one family and we are so thankful for this honor:) "

  5. You may feel that way, Lee, but that's not how this honor works. The committee evaluated only the UK Zion, not any of the other locations around the world. To appropriate the award for the rest goes against the rules of the award.

  6. Have you spoken with the Queen or been invited to Buckingham Palace?! How can you really know what she said to the Church of God? Please, be careful before making accusations when you don't even know what's going on. All you know is the internet and you can't get very far with what he said, she said! Good luck and I'm so sorry for all of the time you wasted on your one-sided research.

    1. I communicated directly with a representative of the Queen's Award office--the quote from her is in the article above. I do my research thoroughly.

      You may be interested in reading the "guidance notes" about this award from
      The eligibility requirements include:
      "The group may be a branch of or affiliated to a larger regional or national organisation, as long as the volunteers started and developed the initiative for the activity locally, and the group's achievements go beyond what is expected of similar groups in the wider organisation's network."
      "Those who benefit from the group's activities can be overseas residents or UK residents (or both) but the group must be based in a UK region or country."
      "More than half the group's volunteers must have the right of residence in the UK."

      The award was only given to the specific UK congregation that was evaluated. It was not given to the worldwide church based in Korea or any of its other congregations. They would not meet the requirements for the award.

    2. I fully understand what type of award it is. I made my point in my previous post ! The point is you weren't there while the Church of God received the award so you can't really know what they discussed. Period! Have a lovely day !

  7. A member of a local church here in Virginia used this award as evidence that the Queen actively promotes the church as a whole unit. When I addressed the above findings the member said that my "keen intellect" was observed but that I should not believe in online postings that are not accurate. This cult has its brainwashing techniques down well. It will never fail to amaze me how members becomes so passionately involved in recruiting non-members and are so suspectible to such brainwashing.